i

We remind our collaborators that Revista de Estudios de la Justicia maintains its reception of articles throughout the year.

In order to comply with our editorial deadlines, articles submitted before April 30 may be published in the upcoming July issue.

Permanent gender violence and self-defense: Considerations based on sentence 648-2021 of the Court of Appeals of Antofagasta

Authors

  • Agustín Ignacio Walker Martínez

Abstract

It’s not novel to state that behind the apparent neutrality of criminal laws, there is a male perspective of law itself, one that does not consider the perspective of women within norms operation. One of the expressions of such a problem takes place in those situations in which a woman ends up injuring or killing her current or former partner at a time when the attack itself has momentarily ceased but within a history of permanent gender abuse and violence. Indeed, this situation raises a series of questions regarding the justification or exoneration of such conduct. Based on a recent Antofagasta’s court ruling, the idea of this article is to find a comparative analysis of the arguments that are used either to accept or reject a self-defense in these cases. With this purpose, the following piece seeks to analyze the traditional interpretation of the self-defense requirements and compare it with a gender perspective interpretation of them, endeavoring to reveal the particularities of cases of incessant gender violence that require a diverse interpretation of those requirements. Additionally, the article seeks to analyze the jurisprudential criteria regarding the relevance of the victim’s statement in such cases.

Keywords:

Self-defense, gender perspective, current aggression, imminent assault, rational need, proof